In replying to the referees comments, authors are advised to use language that would not cause offence when their paper is shown again to the referees, and to bear in mind that if a point was not clear to the referees and/or editors, it is unlikely that it would be clear to the nonspecialist readers of Nature. Remember if your manuscript is sent for a second round of peer review the reviewers will see this letter too. Editorial Process | American Association for Cancer Research The editor contacts potential reviewers to ask them to review the manuscript. 4a. Authors often ask for a new referee to be consulted, particularly in cases where two referees have been used and one is negative, the other positive. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Reviewer selection is critical to the review process, and we work hard to ensure that the different technical and conceptual aspects of the work are covered. Under these circumstances, authors are strongly advised not to resubmit a revised version as it will be declined without further review. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. New referees can often raise new sets of points, which complicates and lengthens the consideration process instead of simplifying it. Under these circumstances, further experiments or technical work are usually required to address some or all of the referees concerns, and revised papers are sent back to some or all of the referees for a second opinion. However, is there a time frame where one can start to feel a bit confident it may not be a desk reject? I submitted a paper to Nature on Sunday Nov 20. Is my manuscript likely to be peer reviewed by now? On the basis of the external reviews and their own reading, the editor makes a decision on the manuscript (accept, revise, reject but encourage resubmission, reject). In my opinion, a simple Gaussian function would have sufficed. Hey everyone. Let us suggest an alternative journal within our esteemed publishing portfolio for resubmitting your manuscript (and any reviewer comments) for fast, effortless publication. The editor responsible for the final decision has the discretion however to weight individual reviewer comments as appropriate based on the expertise of each reviewer in the relevant areas and the reviewers . ISSN 1476-4687 (online) Submit your manuscript via the online submission and review system, eJournalPress, at Authors are usually informed within a week if the paper is not being considered. You can access the status of your manuscript at any time by: This procedure will display detailed tracking information about where your manuscript is in the submission/peer-review process. [CDATA[// >